

A real-world, real-cool, and really easy (most of the time) way to make math a bit more meaningful for elementary math students of all ages, especially if you happen to be about ten!







Problem number one was a subtraction problem, and the most popular strategy was the use of an open number line to add up from $267 to $323. The class then gave a go at "straight subtraction" which uses positive and negative values. Many in the class found this to be even easier to navigate, and most thought that it was faster too. Fast and accurate; you cannot beat that!
The second problem shows a very efficient execution of left to right adding. Adding the greatest place value first can help reduce large errors in calculations. I'd much rather be off by a dollar than a million dollars!
The final problem was almost universally solved by using a "generic rectangle" to multiply 16 by 12. The partial products are usually accurate, easy to calculate, fast, and easy to add up. Some students used multiplication clusters like 16 X 10 and 16 x 2 to solve the problem, and that is another fast and accurate strategy that is great for this factor combination!
These students ROCK!
The first problem was quickly identified as a "subtraction" problem, but it was solved using simple addition. This young mathematician added up from 267 to 323 on an open number line. This is kind of like what folks did in the good old days before cash registers had built in electronic calculators. They would count back the change using landmarks along the way. This student also used landmarks (easily recognized and "easy to work with numbers"), as she first "jumped from 267 to 270. This allowed her to easily add on to 270 in order to get to 300. From 300, the jump to 323 was a piece of cake. Finally, all of the jumps were totalled, and the distance between $267 and $323 was found correctly.
Also of note are the sentence restating the prompt (question) and the matching equation, These also signify a real sense of math understanding.
On the second problem, the student added from left to right, and to me that is great! Adding the largest place values first makes it less likely to make a mistake of great magnitude. Using the traditional algorithm makes it more likely to make a mistake in the larger place values, and that's a real drawback to sticking with traditional algorithmic thinking, unless you REALLY understand the method well.

